From saleh.igal@archongroup.com Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:21:53 -0600 Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:21:53 -0600 From: Igal, Saleh saleh.igal@archongroup.com Subject: [slinkelist] VNC, DCOM (was re: Multi-room controls) From what I understand of VNC, it works similar to pcAnywhere, remote controlling the host computer. However, while my laptop has a 1024X768 screen, my server has a 1600X1024 wide-screen display, so I'd have to scroll around or mess with window sizing. Also, my wife uses CDJ too -- if I was on the server, and she was using the laptop to control CDJ, CDJ would show up on the server's screen. As for some of the other issues, I run strictly NT and 2000, don't use the mp3 features, and didn't really have to do much to mess with library/covers paths. I think almost all networked CDJ users would agree that DCOM was a poor choice for the networking protocol - a native sockets or encapsulated HTTP implementation would be cleaner, more stable, easier to configure, WAN-friendly for streaming control, firewall-friendly for WAN access from work... It would also make it almost trivial to control the Slink-e from almost any OS or scripting language. However, in my situation, the pain of dealing with DCOM is worth the benefit. All that being said, I bought an old terminal server on Ebay for about $50, and will likely roll my own native socket connection over Telnet, putting DCOM to rest. I plan to just use the terminal server's virtual redirector software to direct COM7 and COM8 on the laptop to the Slink-e and DXS ports on the terminal server. Then, CDJ will think it has a direct connection to the Slink-e and DXS. I'll post my results to the list when I get around to messing with it. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Holopainen [mailto:michael@laserle.fi] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 2:19 am To: Igal, Saleh Subject: Re: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls Have you tried VNC ?? http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/download.html I for one find it MUCH better that DCOM : 1. no need for NT server, DCOMcnfg, no need to manually 2. mp3 play on "server" = computer connected on slink 3. no need to mess with library-covers-mp3_files paths 4. I haven't crashed CDJ / VNC not even once in past 1-2 years 5. You can do MUCH more than just CDJ with VNC 6. Easy to set up 7. Small prog 8. You only need to install 1 CDJ (less updating, no version conflict) 9. no need for slinkeserv 10. Oh jeah, and the "small" detail that it's not MS product, so it actually works 11. You can even use CDJ from remote UNIX (Linux) machine -michael (A) "Igal, Saleh" wrote: > > I use a laptop with an 802.11 wireless connection; a server runs slinkesrv. > The server also has my MDB file, covers, and playlists. If I'm anywhere > within earshot, I just grab the laptop to control CDJ. It works great -- I > get full CDJ control from anywhere inside or outside the house. > > There are two annoyances that you will see in any CDJ/DCOM network > configuration. First, CDJ updates reset the DCOM connection data, so I have > to run DCOMCNFG and reconfigure DCOM after every CDJ update. Second, if CDJ > crashes, I have to manually go and restart slinkesrv. > > The newer 11 Mbps wireless cards are fast enough that there's no significant > difference between having the MDB and covers on the server versus the > laptop. If my wife's using the laptop, I just revert back to running CDJ on > the server, since it has the MDB and covers. > > If you're planning to buy a new PC anyway, I'd strongly recommend > considering spending a few hundred bucks more for a laptop and wireless LAN. > > -----Original Message----- > From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On > Behalf Of Ron Tugender > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 10:08 am > To: Slinke-List > Subject: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls > > I've been using Slink-e/CDJ for a while now, but in a rather simple way. > I've had in my office one PC running CDJ, natively controlling a pair of > Sony changers in the living room, with a long Cat-5 run from the PC to the > Slink-e and a long speaker connection from the amplifier in the living room > to satellite speakers in the office. I did most of my listening in the > office, so having the primary CDJ control there was convenient enough. > > I've now acquired a home theatre setup with gorgeous audio in the living > room. I still intend to do a fair amount of listening in the office, but > now quite a bit more in the living room. I now want to control the Sony > players through CDJ (or perhaps PartyGUI) in both the office and the living > room. > > I have a few thoughts on how I might do this, but before I bias the feedback > I'd rather first ask for suggestions from people who have already done > something similar. To focus the suggestions, I'm prepared if necessary to > put another PC in the living room and LAN connection between the living room > and office. > > Ideas, anyone? > > Thanks, > Ron > > ================================================ > Ron Tugender > 408-378-0777 > ron@tugender.com > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist -- --"Would you fly on airplane controlled by MS Windows ?"-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- | Michael Holopainen | Valuraudantie 25 | Tel: +358-(0)9-35093825 | | | 00700 Helsinki | Fax : +358-(0)9-35093850 | | Laserle Oy | Finland | email: michael@laserle.fi| -------------------------------------------------------------------- From cboles@socrates.Berkeley.EDU Tue, 31 Oct 2000 11:15:35 -0800 Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 11:15:35 -0800 From: Colby Boles cboles@socrates.Berkeley.EDU Subject: [slinkelist] New CDJ Version I've posted a new version of CDJ on the site. Happy Halloween! Colby ---CDJ--- 10/31/00 Fixed problem with loading larger playlists which could cause extraneous playlist entries Added support for coloring text according player - see View | Options | Appearance Preview mode is no longer persisted when CDJ reloads Added searchlist_copytoplaylist and library_neverplaycurrenttrack automation commands Fixed problem in keywords which prevented correctly converting a keyword attribute from "whole disc" to "none" when viewing a single track Fixed problem with certain CX270/90ES models being stopped when playing tracks > 9 Fixed multi slink-e player location Events are now generated for EVERY match of an incoming IR or S-Link signal. You can have multiple matching codes in a single device file or across device files. This meand CD device files in CDJ will no longer cause problems. ---slinkeserv--- 10/31/00 Events are now generated for EVERY match of an incoming IR or S-Link signal. You can have multiple matching codes in a single device file or across device files. This meand CD device files in CDJ will no longer cause problems. Slinkeserv now deletes users that have a dead COM interface (e.g. a crashed program) From simon@themasons.net Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:26:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:26:19 -0500 From: Simon Mason simon@themasons.net Subject: [slinkelist] VNC, DCOM (was re: Multi-room controls) It would be nice to have a true client server capability. Run the CDJ as the client, have it connect to slinkeserv through tcp/ip. Then I could open CDJ on any machine connected to my network. This would only work for mw if the MP3 output were from the server. -----Original Message----- From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On Behalf Of Igal, Saleh Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 11:22 AM To: Michael Holopainen Cc: Slinke-List Subject: [slinkelist] VNC, DCOM (was re: Multi-room controls) From what I understand of VNC, it works similar to pcAnywhere, remote controlling the host computer. However, while my laptop has a 1024X768 screen, my server has a 1600X1024 wide-screen display, so I'd have to scroll around or mess with window sizing. Also, my wife uses CDJ too -- if I was on the server, and she was using the laptop to control CDJ, CDJ would show up on the server's screen. As for some of the other issues, I run strictly NT and 2000, don't use the mp3 features, and didn't really have to do much to mess with library/covers paths. I think almost all networked CDJ users would agree that DCOM was a poor choice for the networking protocol - a native sockets or encapsulated HTTP implementation would be cleaner, more stable, easier to configure, WAN-friendly for streaming control, firewall-friendly for WAN access from work... It would also make it almost trivial to control the Slink-e from almost any OS or scripting language. However, in my situation, the pain of dealing with DCOM is worth the benefit. All that being said, I bought an old terminal server on Ebay for about $50, and will likely roll my own native socket connection over Telnet, putting DCOM to rest. I plan to just use the terminal server's virtual redirector software to direct COM7 and COM8 on the laptop to the Slink-e and DXS ports on the terminal server. Then, CDJ will think it has a direct connection to the Slink-e and DXS. I'll post my results to the list when I get around to messing with it. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Holopainen [mailto:michael@laserle.fi] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 2:19 am To: Igal, Saleh Subject: Re: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls Have you tried VNC ?? http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/download.html I for one find it MUCH better that DCOM : 1. no need for NT server, DCOMcnfg, no need to manually 2. mp3 play on "server" = computer connected on slink 3. no need to mess with library-covers-mp3_files paths 4. I haven't crashed CDJ / VNC not even once in past 1-2 years 5. You can do MUCH more than just CDJ with VNC 6. Easy to set up 7. Small prog 8. You only need to install 1 CDJ (less updating, no version conflict) 9. no need for slinkeserv 10. Oh jeah, and the "small" detail that it's not MS product, so it actually works 11. You can even use CDJ from remote UNIX (Linux) machine -michael (A) "Igal, Saleh" wrote: > > I use a laptop with an 802.11 wireless connection; a server runs slinkesrv. > The server also has my MDB file, covers, and playlists. If I'm anywhere > within earshot, I just grab the laptop to control CDJ. It works great -- I > get full CDJ control from anywhere inside or outside the house. > > There are two annoyances that you will see in any CDJ/DCOM network > configuration. First, CDJ updates reset the DCOM connection data, so I have > to run DCOMCNFG and reconfigure DCOM after every CDJ update. Second, if CDJ > crashes, I have to manually go and restart slinkesrv. > > The newer 11 Mbps wireless cards are fast enough that there's no significant > difference between having the MDB and covers on the server versus the > laptop. If my wife's using the laptop, I just revert back to running CDJ on > the server, since it has the MDB and covers. > > If you're planning to buy a new PC anyway, I'd strongly recommend > considering spending a few hundred bucks more for a laptop and wireless LAN. > > -----Original Message----- > From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On > Behalf Of Ron Tugender > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 10:08 am > To: Slinke-List > Subject: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls > > I've been using Slink-e/CDJ for a while now, but in a rather simple way. > I've had in my office one PC running CDJ, natively controlling a pair of > Sony changers in the living room, with a long Cat-5 run from the PC to the > Slink-e and a long speaker connection from the amplifier in the living room > to satellite speakers in the office. I did most of my listening in the > office, so having the primary CDJ control there was convenient enough. > > I've now acquired a home theatre setup with gorgeous audio in the living > room. I still intend to do a fair amount of listening in the office, but > now quite a bit more in the living room. I now want to control the Sony > players through CDJ (or perhaps PartyGUI) in both the office and the living > room. > > I have a few thoughts on how I might do this, but before I bias the feedback > I'd rather first ask for suggestions from people who have already done > something similar. To focus the suggestions, I'm prepared if necessary to > put another PC in the living room and LAN connection between the living room > and office. > > Ideas, anyone? > > Thanks, > Ron > > ================================================ > Ron Tugender > 408-378-0777 > ron@tugender.com > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.co________________________________an/listinfo/slinkelist -- --"Would you fly on airplane controlled by MS Windows ?"-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- | Michael Holopainen | Valuraudantie 25 | Tel: +358-(0)9-35093825 | | | 00700 Helsinki | Fax : +358-(0)9-35093850 | | Laserle Oy | Finland | email: michael@laserle.fi| -------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist From sci4all@yahoo.com Wed, 01 Nov 2000 08:16:02 -0800 Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 08:16:02 -0800 From: John Shankland sci4all@yahoo.com Subject: [slinkelist] VNC, DCOM (was re: Multi-room controls) How about a slinkeserv replacement. It would be two components a com server= =20 for CDJ to talk to, and a normal tcp/ip server to talk to the actual slinke= =20 device. The COM server would run on the same machine as CDJ, but would talk= =20 to the tcp/ip sever instead of a slinke device. This would give the most=20 freedom of choice. People could still use CDJ, or they could just use the=20 tcp/ip server and communicate to it any way they'd like, web, jabber,=20 telnet or whatever comes out in the future. Also it wouldn't require any changes to CDJ. Of course if the tcp/ip server= =20 where stable enough eventually Colby might want to change CDJ to use it=20 instead. At 05:26 PM 10/31/2000 -0500, Simon Mason wrote: >It would be nice to have a true client server capability. Run the CDJ as >the client, have it connect to slinkeserv through tcp/ip. Then I could= open -- =A9=BF=A9=AC John _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From jbg@sdc.cs.boeing.com Wed, 01 Nov 2000 10:51:48 -0800 Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 10:51:48 -0800 From: Jim Glidewell jbg@sdc.cs.boeing.com Subject: [slinkelist] Help - Can't get 3rd party stuff to talk to CDJ Hi all, I've had a slink-e for a while, but only recently started using CDJ. One of the things that I _really_ want out of a jukebox system like this is a "now playing" option. It appears that there are a couple of 3rd party add-ons (2 screensavers & Party GUI) which will do this sort of thing. But... I can't seem to get any of them to work. Configuration: Dell Pentium 100, Windows 95, CDJ 10/13/00, current versions of the screensavers and PartyGUI. CDJ installed in the standard place. It appears that none of these tools "see" the CDJ application. They can see the files (at least Party GUI can) but there doesn't see to be any communication (status or control) between the "helper" apps and CDJ. What I see: Party GUI - runs, sees my CD database, also sees my playlists. None of the buttons do anything except change the Party GUI screen itself. No playlists created/modified either, near as I can tell. Slinkysaver - sits waiting on the opening screen for CDJ to start (it's already running) CDSaver - Black screen, regardless of the colors set in the settings window. Kinda hard to tell what is going on... :-) I did a pretty generic CDJ installation. And I tried to follow the README's for the three helper apps. Here are some issues I'm not clear on (I don't know how Windows inter-app communication works at all): Do these tools require cdjserver, or CDJ, or either? Do I need to install something "extra" besides a standard Win95 install to make the IAC stuff work? Special COM/DCOM install or sumptin'? (I recall that the CDJ installer did some extra MS install...) Does the registry come into play here? (shudder) Does anybody have any debugging suggestions? Finally: How does one force the screensaver to run? I set my "idle" time down to a minute and it never blanks (while running CDJ) My screensaver testing has all been through the "Preview" option in the properties window. Are there options in CDJ which prevent the screensaver from activating (animated icon, for example)? I'm really hoping I've missed something pretty obvious, or skipped a simple but essential step. I plan on going back and rereading the READMEs, etc. this evening, but I thought that somebody might be able to point me to my "Doh!" mistake. Thanks for your help... Jim -- Jim Glidewell jim_glidewell@yahoo.com From sci4all@yahoo.com Wed, 01 Nov 2000 12:24:48 -0800 Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 12:24:48 -0800 From: John Shankland sci4all@yahoo.com Subject: [slinkelist] Help - Can't get 3rd party stuff to talk to CDJ You need to set CDJ so that it uses slinkeserve. I'm at work so I don't=20 have access to the app, but it's somewhere in the preferences. At 10:51 AM 11/1/2000 -0800, Jim Glidewell wrote: >Hi all, > >I've had a slink-e for a while, but only recently started >using CDJ. One of the things that I _really_ want out of >a jukebox system like this is a "now playing" option. > >It appears that there are a couple of 3rd party add-ons >(2 screensavers & Party GUI) which will do this sort >of thing. But... I can't seem to get any of them to >work. > >Configuration: Dell Pentium 100, Windows 95, CDJ 10/13/00, >current versions of the screensavers and PartyGUI. CDJ >installed in the standard place. > >It appears that none of these tools "see" the CDJ application. >They can see the files (at least Party GUI can) but there >doesn't see to be any communication (status or control) >between the "helper" apps and CDJ. > >What I see: > >Party GUI - runs, sees my CD database, also sees my playlists. >None of the buttons do anything except change the Party GUI >screen itself. No playlists created/modified either, near as >I can tell. > >Slinkysaver - sits waiting on the opening screen for CDJ to >start (it's already running) > >CDSaver - Black screen, regardless of the colors set in the >settings window. Kinda hard to tell what is going on... :-) > >I did a pretty generic CDJ installation. And I tried to >follow the README's for the three helper apps. > >Here are some issues I'm not clear on (I don't know how >Windows inter-app communication works at all): > >Do these tools require cdjserver, or CDJ, or either? > >Do I need to install something "extra" besides a standard >Win95 install to make the IAC stuff work? Special COM/DCOM >install or sumptin'? (I recall that the CDJ installer did >some extra MS install...) > >Does the registry come into play here? (shudder) > >Does anybody have any debugging suggestions? > >Finally: > >How does one force the screensaver to run? > >I set my "idle" time down to a minute and it never blanks >(while running CDJ) My screensaver testing has all been >through the "Preview" option in the properties window. >Are there options in CDJ which prevent the screensaver >from activating (animated icon, for example)? > >I'm really hoping I've missed something pretty obvious, or >skipped a simple but essential step. I plan on going back >and rereading the READMEs, etc. this evening, but I thought >that somebody might be able to point me to my "Doh!" mistake. > >Thanks for your help... > >Jim >-- >Jim Glidewell >jim_glidewell@yahoo.com > > >_______________________________________________ >slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com >http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist -- =A9=BF=A9=AC John __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com From John.C.Ryan@msdw.com Wed, 01 Nov 2000 14:44:53 -0500 Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 14:44:53 -0500 From: John Ryan John.C.Ryan@msdw.com Subject: [slinkelist] Help - Can't get 3rd party stuff to talk to CDJ Looks like you need to set CDJ to comunicate with your slinke via slinkeserv. I think it is somewhere under options. Jim Glidewell wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've had a slink-e for a while, but only recently started > using CDJ. One of the things that I _really_ want out of > a jukebox system like this is a "now playing" option. > > It appears that there are a couple of 3rd party add-ons > (2 screensavers & Party GUI) which will do this sort > of thing. But... I can't seem to get any of them to > work. > > Configuration: Dell Pentium 100, Windows 95, CDJ 10/13/00, > current versions of the screensavers and PartyGUI. CDJ > installed in the standard place. > > It appears that none of these tools "see" the CDJ application. > They can see the files (at least Party GUI can) but there > doesn't see to be any communication (status or control) > between the "helper" apps and CDJ. > > What I see: > > Party GUI - runs, sees my CD database, also sees my playlists. > None of the buttons do anything except change the Party GUI > screen itself. No playlists created/modified either, near as > I can tell. > > Slinkysaver - sits waiting on the opening screen for CDJ to > start (it's already running) > > CDSaver - Black screen, regardless of the colors set in the > settings window. Kinda hard to tell what is going on... :-) > > I did a pretty generic CDJ installation. And I tried to > follow the README's for the three helper apps. > > Here are some issues I'm not clear on (I don't know how > Windows inter-app communication works at all): > > Do these tools require cdjserver, or CDJ, or either? > > Do I need to install something "extra" besides a standard > Win95 install to make the IAC stuff work? Special COM/DCOM > install or sumptin'? (I recall that the CDJ installer did > some extra MS install...) > > Does the registry come into play here? (shudder) > > Does anybody have any debugging suggestions? > > Finally: > > How does one force the screensaver to run? > > I set my "idle" time down to a minute and it never blanks > (while running CDJ) My screensaver testing has all been > through the "Preview" option in the properties window. > Are there options in CDJ which prevent the screensaver > from activating (animated icon, for example)? > > I'm really hoping I've missed something pretty obvious, or > skipped a simple but essential step. I plan on going back > and rereading the READMEs, etc. this evening, but I thought > that somebody might be able to point me to my "Doh!" mistake. > > Thanks for your help... > > Jim > -- > Jim Glidewell > jim_glidewell@yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist From davidburkhart@earthlink.net Wed, 1 Nov 2000 15:20:45 -0800 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 15:20:45 -0800 From: David Burkhart davidburkhart@earthlink.net Subject: [slinkelist] User-submitted Apps Is anyone out there thinking about getting a working Covers application again? Also, it looks like the CDJReader download link is broken... From iancole@earthlink.net Wed, 1 Nov 2000 18:20:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 18:20:31 -0500 From: Ian Cole iancole@earthlink.net Subject: [slinkelist] VNC, DCOM (was re: Multi-room controls) A TCP/IP "socket server" exists today - www.technovelocity.com/hase The BETA 2 release is now available for download, so you can try it today :>) ----- Original Message ----- From: John Shankland To: ; 'Igal, Saleh' ; 'Michael Holopainen' Cc: 'Slinke-List' Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 11:16 AM Subject: RE: [slinkelist] VNC, DCOM (was re: Multi-room controls) > How about a slinkeserv replacement. It would be two components a com server > for CDJ to talk to, and a normal tcp/ip server to talk to the actual slinke > device. The COM server would run on the same machine as CDJ, but would talk > to the tcp/ip sever instead of a slinke device. This would give the mos= t > freedom of choice. People could still use CDJ, or they could just use t= he > tcp/ip server and communicate to it any way they'd like, web, jabber, > telnet or whatever comes out in the future. > > Also it wouldn't require any changes to CDJ. Of course if the tcp/ip server > where stable enough eventually Colby might want to change CDJ to use it > instead. > > At 05:26 PM 10/31/2000 -0500, Simon Mason wrote: > >It would be nice to have a true client server capability. Run the CDJ= as > >the client, have it connect to slinkeserv through tcp/ip. Then I coul= d open > > > -- > =A9=BF=A9=AC > John > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist > From wmckeen1@home.com Wed, 1 Nov 2000 20:48:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 20:48:55 -0500 From: Wayne McKeen wmckeen1@home.com Subject: [slinkelist] Sony 450-200disc This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C04445.26D1F4E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all; I'm thinking about getting a couple of the Sony 450 - 200 disc changers... Has anybody had any problems with it or usage with Slinke? Any problems/complaints regarding sound quality using digital out? Any problems/complaints regarding the 2-way remote? Thanks for your help/opinions, in advance! ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C04445.26D1F4E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi=20 all;
 
I'm = thinking about=20 getting a couple of the Sony 450 - 200 disc = changers...
 
Has = anybody had any=20 problems with it or usage with Slinke? 
Any=20 problems/complaints regarding sound quality using digital=20 out?
Any=20 problems/complaints regarding the 2-way remote?
 
Thanks = for your=20 help/opinions, in advance!
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C04445.26D1F4E0-- From mypeter@bigfoot.com Wed, 1 Nov 2000 18:04:52 -0800 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 18:04:52 -0800 From: Peter Myers mypeter@bigfoot.com Subject: [slinkelist] Sony 450-200disc This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C0442E.3B9E7A40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Do you mean a cdpcx450 or a 200 disc changer? (The 450 is a 400 disc = changer.) I have (sort of) 2 450's and 2 350's (300 disc changers). = the 350's have been fantastic. One of the 450's out of the box had = loading problems and was immediately returned (replacement due this = week). The other one seems to have sporadic loading problem and reports = discs missing that are in fact there. Don't know if this is universal = to all 450's or just mine. Also, get the cdpcx 400 (or 300) rather than = the 450 or 350, unless you need the video out or two way remotes. Neat = features, but I don't use them at all with my cdj/slinky set up. The = money I've spent for those features would almost pay for my next = changer. Pete ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Wayne McKeen=20 To: 'Slinke-List'=20 Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 5:48 PM Subject: [slinkelist] Sony 450-200disc Hi all; I'm thinking about getting a couple of the Sony 450 - 200 disc = changers... Has anybody had any problems with it or usage with Slinke?=20 Any problems/complaints regarding sound quality using digital out? Any problems/complaints regarding the 2-way remote? Thanks for your help/opinions, in advance! ------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C0442E.3B9E7A40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Do you mean a cdpcx450 or a 200 disc = changer? =20 (The 450 is a 400 disc changer.)  I have (sort of) 2 450's and 2 = 350's (300=20 disc changers).  the 350's have been fantastic.  One of the = 450's out=20 of the box had loading problems and was immediately returned = (replacement due=20 this week).  The other one seems to have sporadic loading problem = and=20 reports discs missing that are in fact there.  Don't know if this = is=20 universal to all 450's or just mine.  Also, get the cdpcx 400 (or = 300)=20 rather than the 450 or 350, unless you need the video out or two way=20 remotes.  Neat features, but I don't use them at all with my = cdj/slinky set=20 up.  The money I've spent for those features would almost pay for = my next=20 changer.
 
Pete
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Wayne = McKeen=20
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, = 2000 5:48=20 PM
Subject: [slinkelist] Sony=20 450-200disc

Hi=20 all;
 
I'm = thinking about=20 getting a couple of the Sony 450 - 200 disc = changers...
 
Has = anybody had=20 any problems with it or usage with Slinke? 
Any=20 problems/complaints regarding sound quality using digital=20 out?
Any=20 problems/complaints regarding the 2-way remote?
 
Thanks for your=20 help/opinions, in advance!
 
 
= ------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C0442E.3B9E7A40-- From wmckeen1@home.com Wed, 1 Nov 2000 21:09:10 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 21:09:10 -0500 From: Wayne McKeen wmckeen1@home.com Subject: [slinkelist] Sony 450-200disc This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C04447.FACA42A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit yes I do mean the 400 disc...my typo...anyone else? -----Original Message----- From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On Behalf Of Peter Myers Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 9:05 PM To: Wayne McKeen; 'Slinke-List' Subject: Re: [slinkelist] Sony 450-200disc Do you mean a cdpcx450 or a 200 disc changer? (The 450 is a 400 disc changer.) I have (sort of) 2 450's and 2 350's (300 disc changers). the 350's have been fantastic. One of the 450's out of the box had loading problems and was immediately returned (replacement due this week). The other one seems to have sporadic loading problem and reports discs missing that are in fact there. Don't know if this is universal to all 450's or just mine. Also, get the cdpcx 400 (or 300) rather than the 450 or 350, unless you need the video out or two way remotes. Neat features, but I don't use them at all with my cdj/slinky set up. The money I've spent for those features would almost pay for my next changer. Pete ----- Original Message ----- From: Wayne McKeen To: 'Slinke-List' Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 5:48 PM Subject: [slinkelist] Sony 450-200disc Hi all; I'm thinking about getting a couple of the Sony 450 - 200 disc changers... Has anybody had any problems with it or usage with Slinke? Any problems/complaints regarding sound quality using digital out? Any problems/complaints regarding the 2-way remote? Thanks for your help/opinions, in advance! ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C04447.FACA42A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
yes I=20 do mean the 400 disc...my typo...anyone else?
-----Original Message-----
From: = slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com=20 [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On Behalf Of Peter=20 Myers
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 9:05 = PM
To: Wayne=20 McKeen; 'Slinke-List'
Subject: Re: [slinkelist] Sony=20 450-200disc

Do you mean a cdpcx450 or a 200 disc=20 changer?  (The 450 is a 400 disc changer.)  I have (sort of) = 2 450's=20 and 2 350's (300 disc changers).  the 350's have been = fantastic. =20 One of the 450's out of the box had loading problems and was = immediately=20 returned (replacement due this week).  The other one seems to = have=20 sporadic loading problem and reports discs missing that are in fact=20 there.  Don't know if this is universal to all 450's or just = mine. =20 Also, get the cdpcx 400 (or 300) rather than the 450 or 350, unless = you need=20 the video out or two way remotes.  Neat features, but I don't use = them at=20 all with my cdj/slinky set up.  The money I've spent for those = features=20 would almost pay for my next changer.
 
Pete
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Wayne = McKeen=20
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, = 2000 5:48=20 PM
Subject: [slinkelist] Sony=20 450-200disc

Hi = all;
 
I'm thinking=20 about getting a couple of the Sony 450 - 200 disc=20 changers...
 
Has anybody had=20 any problems with it or usage with Slinke? 
Any=20 problems/complaints regarding sound quality using digital=20 out?
Any=20 problems/complaints regarding the 2-way remote?
 
Thanks for your=20 help/opinions, in advance!
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C04447.FACA42A0-- From dmorgen@alum.mit.edu Thu, 02 Nov 2000 08:01:58 -0500 Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 08:01:58 -0500 From: David Morgenlender dmorgen@alum.mit.edu Subject: [slinkelist] Sony 450-200disc On Wed, 1 Nov 2000 18:04:52 -0800, you wrote: >One of the 450's out of the box had loading problems and was immediately= returned (replacement due this week). =20 >The other one seems to have sporadic loading problem and reports discs = missing that are in fact there. =20 >Don't know if this is universal to all 450's or just mine.=20 I have one CX450 ... I haven't run into any of these problems ... & = hopefully it will stay that way ! =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Dave Morgenlender e-mail: dmorgen@alum.mit.edu =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D From keith@weldondesign.com Fri, 3 Nov 2000 10:53:08 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 10:53:08 -0500 From: Keith keith@weldondesign.com Subject: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls (was re: VNC, DCOM) Hello - I too find VNC to be a better solution for Multi-room Control than DCOM and Slinkesrv. The one thing I found I could do with VNC that I could not do with DCOM and Slinkesrv was to let multiple PC's have simultaneous control of CDJ. I have a PC in the kitchen, one in the family room and one in each bedroom simultaneously connected via VNC to a PC dedicated to running CDJ and the Slink-e. This allows everyone to see or make changes to what is playing from any location in the house. I like being able to roam around the house, walk up to the nearest PC, glance at the screen to see what is playing, tickle the keyboard to search for a specific song and add it to the playlist. I can't think of a better solution than VNC if you want multi-room control from PC control stations. Multi-room control from handheld remotes or wall mounted controls is a different story. But from PC's I can't think of a better solution than VNC. Regards, Keith Weldon -----Original Message----- From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com] On Behalf Of Igal, Saleh Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 11:22 AM To: Michael Holopainen Cc: Slinke-List Subject: [slinkelist] VNC, DCOM (was re: Multi-room controls) From what I understand of VNC, it works similar to pcAnywhere, remote controlling the host computer. However, while my laptop has a 1024X768 screen, my server has a 1600X1024 wide-screen display, so I'd have to scroll around or mess with window sizing. Also, my wife uses CDJ too -- if I was on the server, and she was using the laptop to control CDJ, CDJ would show up on the server's screen. As for some of the other issues, I run strictly NT and 2000, don't use the mp3 features, and didn't really have to do much to mess with library/covers paths. I think almost all networked CDJ users would agree that DCOM was a poor choice for the networking protocol - a native sockets or encapsulated HTTP implementation would be cleaner, more stable, easier to configure, WAN-friendly for streaming control, firewall-friendly for WAN access from work... It would also make it almost trivial to control the Slink-e from almost any OS or scripting language. However, in my situation, the pain of dealing with DCOM is worth the benefit. All that being said, I bought an old terminal server on Ebay for about $50, and will likely roll my own native socket connection over Telnet, putting DCOM to rest. I plan to just use the terminal server's virtual redirector software to direct COM7 and COM8 on the laptop to the Slink-e and DXS ports on the terminal server. Then, CDJ will think it has a direct connection to the Slink-e and DXS. I'll post my results to the list when I get around to messing with it. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Holopainen [mailto:michael@laserle.fi] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 2:19 am To: Igal, Saleh Subject: Re: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls Have you tried VNC ?? http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/download.html I for one find it MUCH better that DCOM : 1. no need for NT server, DCOMcnfg, no need to manually 2. mp3 play on "server" = computer connected on slink 3. no need to mess with library-covers-mp3_files paths 4. I haven't crashed CDJ / VNC not even once in past 1-2 years 5. You can do MUCH more than just CDJ with VNC 6. Easy to set up 7. Small prog 8. You only need to install 1 CDJ (less updating, no version conflict) 9. no need for slinkeserv 10. Oh jeah, and the "small" detail that it's not MS product, so it actually works 11. You can even use CDJ from remote UNIX (Linux) machine -michael (A) "Igal, Saleh" wrote: > > I use a laptop with an 802.11 wireless connection; a server runs slinkesrv. > The server also has my MDB file, covers, and playlists. If I'm anywhere > within earshot, I just grab the laptop to control CDJ. It works great -- I > get full CDJ control from anywhere inside or outside the house. > > There are two annoyances that you will see in any CDJ/DCOM network > configuration. First, CDJ updates reset the DCOM connection data, so I have > to run DCOMCNFG and reconfigure DCOM after every CDJ update. Second, if CDJ > crashes, I have to manually go and restart slinkesrv. > > The newer 11 Mbps wireless cards are fast enough that there's no significant > difference between having the MDB and covers on the server versus the > laptop. If my wife's using the laptop, I just revert back to running CDJ on > the server, since it has the MDB and covers. > > If you're planning to buy a new PC anyway, I'd strongly recommend > considering spending a few hundred bucks more for a laptop and wireless LAN. > > -----Original Message----- > From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On > Behalf Of Ron Tugender > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 10:08 am > To: Slinke-List > Subject: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls > > I've been using Slink-e/CDJ for a while now, but in a rather simple way. > I've had in my office one PC running CDJ, natively controlling a pair of > Sony changers in the living room, with a long Cat-5 run from the PC to the > Slink-e and a long speaker connection from the amplifier in the living room > to satellite speakers in the office. I did most of my listening in the > office, so having the primary CDJ control there was convenient enough. > > I've now acquired a home theatre setup with gorgeous audio in the living > room. I still intend to do a fair amount of listening in the office, but > now quite a bit more in the living room. I now want to control the Sony > players through CDJ (or perhaps PartyGUI) in both the office and the living > room. > > I have a few thoughts on how I might do this, but before I bias the feedback > I'd rather first ask for suggestions from people who have already done > something similar. To focus the suggestions, I'm prepared if necessary to > put another PC in the living room and LAN connection between the living room > and office. > > Ideas, anyone? > > Thanks, > Ron > > ================================================ > Ron Tugender > 408-378-0777 > ron@tugender.com > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist -- --"Would you fly on airplane controlled by MS Windows ?"-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- | Michael Holopainen | Valuraudantie 25 | Tel: +358-(0)9-35093825 | | | 00700 Helsinki | Fax : +358-(0)9-35093850 | | Laserle Oy | Finland | email: michael@laserle.fi| -------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist From cjrose@mediaone.net Sat, 4 Nov 2000 00:39:43 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 00:39:43 -0500 From: Carl J. Rose cjrose@mediaone.net Subject: [slinkelist] Two sound cards and hum This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C045F7.B94ACE60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I tried the two sound card thing with a SB AWE 64 as default and a D-man = card with RCA in and out to play mp3 with cdj. Well, It worked right = the first after install. However, after that the default card took over = and played everything, including mp3 with cdj! The settings in cdj = still showed the auxilliary card in control, but the proof is in the = pudding. Any thoughts about this? Also, I have a terrible problem with hum when I put my audio out from my = sound card intomy Denon receiver for playback. I have moved the unit = and even tried a Pioneer receiver and even changed sound cards and still = no help. You Slinker's out all talk about your mp3/cd playback mixes,! = Are you putting up with a pretty noticeable hum or have you got some = magic bullet? I have even tried digital out but that is a maze of output types like = spdif and electrical spdif and optical and even a new sony output from = the new SB Live! 5.1 card Sign me "Confused in Ohio" Thanks, Carl ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Shawn Boyle=20 To: slinkeList@nirvis.com=20 Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 1:13 PM Subject: RE: [slinkelist] Two sound cards I use two SB PCI cards. They have two slightly different model numbers = but from what I can tell are exactly the same. The setup was much easier = than expected. My HA server runs Win2K Pro, and already had one SB = working. I just added the second card, Windows found it, and everything = pretty much worked. I was ready for some major problems, but I didn't = run into any. =20 You set one of the cards as the default sound device. Windows will use = this card for all of the system sounds and most other programs will use = this card for their sounds. But if you have a program that supports = using a different sound card, like CDJ [thanks again Colby], then you = can choose which sound card that program uses. If you're writing your = own program there's a document on Microsoft's site that explains how to = choose different sound cards using VB. I haven't really looked at it but = on first glance it seemed pretty straight forward.=20 =20 On my HA server I have all of the system sounds go to a small set of = desktop speakers, CDJ sends MP3 output to the other card which is = connected to my amp. =20 -Shawn -----Original Message----- From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com = [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On Behalf Of Carl J. Rose Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 11:01 PM To: slinkeList@nirvis.com Subject: [slinkelist] Two sound cards There has been some talk about using two sound cards on this list. = Many questions come to mind. Do the choices of cards matter? What settings are needed? Can you direct different sounds to different cards? Thanks for your help, carl ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C045F7.B94ACE60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I tried the two sound card thing with a = SB AWE 64=20 as default and a D-man card with RCA in and out to play mp3 with = cdj. =20 Well, It worked right the first after install.  However, after that = the=20 default card took over and played everything, including mp3 with = cdj!  The=20 settings in cdj still showed  the auxilliary card in control, but = the proof=20 is in the pudding.  Any thoughts about this?
 
Also, I have a terrible problem with = hum when I put=20 my audio out from my sound card intomy Denon receiver for = playback.  I have=20 moved the unit and even tried a Pioneer receiver and even changed sound = cards=20 and still no help.  You Slinker's out all talk about your mp3/cd = playback=20 mixes,!  Are you putting up with a pretty noticeable hum or have = you got=20 some magic bullet?
 
I have even tried digital out but that = is a maze of=20 output types like spdif and electrical spdif and optical and even a new = sony=20 output from the new SB Live! 5.1 card
Sign me "Confused in Ohio"
 
Thanks,
Carl
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Shawn = Boyle=20
To: slinkeList@nirvis.com
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 = 1:13=20 PM
Subject: RE: [slinkelist] Two = sound=20 cards

I = use two SB PCI=20 cards. They have two slightly different model numbers but from what I = can tell=20 are exactly the same. The setup was much easier than expected. My HA = server=20 runs Win2K Pro, and already had one SB working. I just added the = second card,=20 Windows found it, and everything pretty much worked. I was ready for = some=20 major problems, but I didn't run into any.
 
You = set one of the=20 cards as the default sound device. Windows will use this card for all = of the=20 system sounds and most other programs will use this card for their = sounds. But=20 if you have a program that supports using a different sound card, = like=20 CDJ [thanks again Colby], then you can choose which sound card that = program=20 uses. If you're writing your own program there's a document on = Microsoft's=20 site that explains how to choose different sound cards using VB. I = haven't=20 really looked at it but on first glance it seemed pretty straight = forward.=20
 
On = my HA server I=20 have all of the system sounds go to a small set of desktop speakers, = CDJ sends=20 MP3 output to the other card which is connected to my = amp.
 
-Shawn
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com = [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On Behalf=20 Of Carl J. Rose
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 11:01 = PM
To: slinkeList@nirvis.com
Subject: = [slinkelist] Two=20 sound cards

There has been some talk about = using two sound=20 cards on this list.  Many questions come to mind.
Do the choices of cards = matter?
What settings are = needed?
Can you direct different sounds to = different=20 cards?
Thanks for your help, =20 carl
------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C045F7.B94ACE60-- From simon@themasons.net Sat, 4 Nov 2000 08:16:00 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 08:16:00 -0500 From: Simon Mason simon@themasons.net Subject: [slinkelist] Two sound cards and hum This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C04637.79316600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Go to Radio Shack and get one of those automobile hum noise reducers. It has RCA in and out and does the trick. I have one hooked up on the back of my PC before it goes into the mixer that combines the output from the CD players. -----Original Message----- From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On Behalf Of Carl J. Rose Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 12:40 AM To: Shawn Boyle Cc: slinkeList@nirvis.com; John W. Schaaf Subject: Re: [slinkelist] Two sound cards and hum I tried the two sound card thing with a SB AWE 64 as default and a D-man card with RCA in and out to play mp3 with cdj. Well, It worked right the first after install. However, after that the default card took over and played everything, including mp3 with cdj! The settings in cdj still showed the auxilliary card in control, but the proof is in the pudding. Any thoughts about this? Also, I have a terrible problem with hum when I put my audio out from my sound card intomy Denon receiver for playback. I have moved the unit and even tried a Pioneer receiver and even changed sound cards and still no help. You Slinker's out all talk about your mp3/cd playback mixes,! Are you putting up with a pretty noticeable hum or have you got some magic bullet? I have even tried digital out but that is a maze of output types like spdif and electrical spdif and optical and even a new sony output from the new SB Live! 5.1 card Sign me "Confused in Ohio" Thanks, Carl ----- Original Message ----- From: Shawn Boyle To: slinkeList@nirvis.com Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 1:13 PM Subject: RE: [slinkelist] Two sound cards I use two SB PCI cards. They have two slightly different model numbers but from what I can tell are exactly the same. The setup was much easier than expected. My HA server runs Win2K Pro, and already had one SB working. I just added the second card, Windows found it, and everything pretty much worked. I was ready for some major problems, but I didn't run into any. You set one of the cards as the default sound device. Windows will use this card for all of the system sounds and most other programs will use this card for their sounds. But if you have a program that supports using a different sound card, like CDJ [thanks again Colby], then you can choose which sound card that program uses. If you're writing your own program there's a document on Microsoft's site that explains how to choose different sound cards using VB. I haven't really looked at it but on first glance it seemed pretty straight forward. On my HA server I have all of the system sounds go to a small set of desktop speakers, CDJ sends MP3 output to the other card which is connected to my amp. -Shawn -----Original Message----- From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On Behalf Of Carl J. Rose Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 11:01 PM To: slinkeList@nirvis.com Subject: [slinkelist] Two sound cards There has been some talk about using two sound cards on this list. Many questions come to mind. Do the choices of cards matter? What settings are needed? Can you direct different sounds to different cards? Thanks for your help, carl ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C04637.79316600 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Go to=20 Radio Shack and get one of those automobile hum noise reducers.  It = has RCA=20 in and out and does the trick.  I have one hooked up on the back of = my PC=20 before it goes into the mixer that combines the output from the CD=20 players.
-----Original Message-----
From: = slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com=20 [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On Behalf Of Carl J.=20 Rose
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 12:40 = AM
To: Shawn=20 Boyle
Cc: slinkeList@nirvis.com; John W. = Schaaf
Subject:=20 Re: [slinkelist] Two sound cards and hum

I tried the two sound card thing with = a SB AWE 64=20 as default and a D-man card with RCA in and out to play mp3 with = cdj. =20 Well, It worked right the first after install.  However, after = that the=20 default card took over and played everything, including mp3 with = cdj! =20 The settings in cdj still showed  the auxilliary card in control, = but the=20 proof is in the pudding.  Any thoughts about this?
 
Also, I have a terrible problem with = hum when I=20 put my audio out from my sound card intomy Denon receiver for = playback. =20 I have moved the unit and even tried a Pioneer receiver and even = changed sound=20 cards and still no help.  You Slinker's out all talk about your = mp3/cd=20 playback mixes,!  Are you putting up with a pretty noticeable hum = or have=20 you got some magic bullet?
 
I have even tried digital out but = that is a maze=20 of output types like spdif and electrical spdif and optical and even a = new=20 sony output from the new SB Live! 5.1 card
Sign me "Confused in = Ohio"
 
Thanks,
Carl
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Shawn = Boyle=20
To: slinkeList@nirvis.com
Sent: Friday, October 27, = 2000 1:13=20 PM
Subject: RE: [slinkelist] Two = sound=20 cards

I = use two SB PCI=20 cards. They have two slightly different model numbers but from what = I can=20 tell are exactly the same. The setup was much easier than expected. = My HA=20 server runs Win2K Pro, and already had one SB working. I just added = the=20 second card, Windows found it, and everything pretty much worked. I = was=20 ready for some major problems, but I didn't run into=20 any.
 
You set one of=20 the cards as the default sound device. Windows will use this card = for all of=20 the system sounds and most other programs will use this card for = their=20 sounds. But if you have a program that supports using a = different sound=20 card, like CDJ [thanks again Colby], then you can choose which sound = card=20 that program uses. If you're writing your own program there's a = document on=20 Microsoft's site that explains how to choose different sound cards = using VB.=20 I haven't really looked at it but on first glance it seemed pretty = straight=20 forward.
 
On = my HA server=20 I have all of the system sounds go to a small set of desktop = speakers, CDJ=20 sends MP3 output to the other card which is connected to my=20 amp.
 
-Shawn
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com = [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On=20 Behalf Of Carl J. Rose
Sent: Thursday, October 26, = 2000=20 11:01 PM
To: slinkeList@nirvis.com
Subject:=20 [slinkelist] Two sound cards

There has been some talk about = using two=20 sound cards on this list.  Many questions come to = mind.
Do the choices of cards = matter?
What settings are = needed?
Can you direct different sounds = to different=20 cards?
Thanks for your help, =20 = carl
------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C04637.79316600-- From simon@themasons.net Sat, 4 Nov 2000 08:16:31 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 08:16:31 -0500 From: Simon Mason simon@themasons.net Subject: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls (was re: VNC, DCOM) Does VNC do essentially the same thing as pcAnywhere? -----Original Message----- From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On Behalf Of Keith Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 10:53 AM To: slinkelist@nirvis.com Subject: RE: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls (was re: VNC, DCOM) Hello - I too find VNC to be a better solution for Multi-room Control than DCOM and Slinkesrv. The one thing I found I could do with VNC that I could not do with DCOM and Slinkesrv was to let multiple PC's have simultaneous control of CDJ. I have a PC in the kitchen, one in the family room and one in each bedroom simultaneously connected via VNC to a PC dedicated to running CDJ and the Slink-e. This allows everyone to see or make changes to what is playing from any location in the house. I like being able to roam around the house, walk up to the nearest PC, glance at the screen to see what is playing, tickle the keyboard to search for a specific song and add it to the playlist. I can't think of a better solution than VNC if you want multi-room control from PC control stations. Multi-room control from handheld remotes or wall mounted controls is a different story. But from PC's I can't think of a better solution than VNC. Regards, Keith Weldon -----Original Message----- From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com] On Behalf Of Igal, Saleh Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 11:22 AM To: Michael Holopainen Cc: Slinke-List Subject: [slinkelist] VNC, DCOM (was re: Multi-room controls) From what I understand of VNC, it works similar to pcAnywhere, remote controlling the host computer. However, while my laptop has a 1024X768 screen, my server has a 1600X1024 wide-screen display, so I'd have to scroll around or mess with window sizing. Also, my wife uses CDJ too -- if I was on the server, and she was using the laptop to control CDJ, CDJ would show up on the server's screen. As for some of the other issues, I run strictly NT and 2000, don't use the mp3 features, and didn't really have to do much to mess with library/covers paths. I think almost all networked CDJ users would agree that DCOM was a poor choice for the networking protocol - a native sockets or encapsulated HTTP implementation would be cleaner, more stable, easier to configure, WAN-friendly for streaming control, firewall-friendly for WAN access from work... It would also make it almost trivial to control the Slink-e from almost any OS or scripting language. However, in my situation, the pain of dealing with DCOM is worth the benefit. All that being said, I bought an old terminal server on Ebay for about $50, and will likely roll my own native socket connection over Telnet, putting DCOM to rest. I plan to just use the terminal server's virtual redirector software to direct COM7 and COM8 on the laptop to the Slink-e and DXS ports on the terminal server. Then, CDJ will think it has a direct connection to the Slink-e and DXS. I'll post my results to the list when I get around to messing with it. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Holopainen [mailto:michael@laserle.fi] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 2:19 am To: Igal, Saleh Subject: Re: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls Have you tried VNC ?? http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/download.html I for one find it MUCH better that DCOM : 1. no need for NT server, DCOMcnfg, no need to manually 2. mp3 play on "server" = computer connected on slink 3. no need to mess with library-covers-mp3_files paths 4. I haven't crashed CDJ / VNC not even once in past 1-2 years 5. You can do MUCH more than just CDJ with VNC 6. Easy to set up 7. Small prog 8. You only need to install 1 CDJ (less updating, no version conflict) 9. no need for slinkeserv 10. Oh jeah, and the "small" detail that it's not MS product, so it actually works 11. You can even use CDJ from remote UNIX (Linux) machine -michael (A) "Igal, Saleh" wrote: > > I use a laptop with an 802.11 wireless connection; a server runs slinkesrv. > The server also has my MDB file, covers, and playlists. If I'm anywhere > within earshot, I just grab the laptop to control CDJ. It works great -- I > get full CDJ control from anywhere inside or outside the house. > > There are two annoyances that you will see in any CDJ/DCOM network > configuration. First, CDJ updates reset the DCOM connection data, so I have > to run DCOMCNFG and reconfigure DCOM after every CDJ update. Second, if CDJ > crashes, I have to manually go and restart slinkesrv. > > The newer 11 Mbps wireless cards are fast enough that there's no significant > difference between having the MDB and covers on the server versus the > laptop. If my wife's using the laptop, I just revert back to running CDJ on > the server, since it has the MDB and covers. > > If you're planning to buy a new PC anyway, I'd strongly recommend > considering spending a few hundred bucks more for a laptop and wireless LAN. > > -----Original Message----- > From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On > Behalf Of Ron Tugender > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 10:08 am > To: Slinke-List > Subject: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls > > I've been using Slink-e/CDJ for a while now, but in a rather simple way. > I've had in my office one PC running CDJ, natively controlling a pair of > Sony changers in the living room, with a long Cat-5 run from the PC to the > Slink-e and a long speaker connection from the amplifier in the living room > to satellite speakers in the office. I did most of my listening in the > office, so having the primary CDJ control there was convenient enough. > > I've now acquired a home theatre setup with gorgeous audio in the living > room. I still intend to do a fair amount of listening in the office, but > now quite a bit more in the living room. I now want to control the Sony > players through CDJ (or perhaps PartyGUI) in both the office and the living > room. > > I have a few thoughts on how I might do this, but before I bias the feedback > I'd rather first ask for suggestions from people who have already done > something similar. To focus the suggestions, I'm prepared if necessary to > put another PC in the living room and LAN connection between the living room > and office. > > Ideas, anyone? > > Thanks, > Ron > > ================================================ > Ron Tugender > 408-378-0777 > ron@tugender.com > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist -- --"Would you fly on airplane controlled by MS Windows ?"-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- | Michael Holopainen | Valuraudantie 25 | Tel: +358-(0)9-35093825 | | | 00700 Helsinki | Fax : +358-(0)9-35093850 | | Laserle Oy | Finland | email: michael@laserle.fi| -------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist _______________________________________________ slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist From mike@macgirvin.com Sat, 04 Nov 2000 05:21:07 -0800 Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 05:21:07 -0800 From: Mike Macgirvin mike@macgirvin.com Subject: [slinkelist] Two sound cards and hum > Also, I have a terrible problem with hum when I put my audio out from my sound card intomy Denon > receiver for playback. I have moved the unit and even tried a Pioneer receiver and even changed sound > cards and still no help. You Slinker's out all talk about your mp3/cd playback mixes,! Are you putting > up with a pretty noticeable hum or have you got some magic bullet? > > I have even tried digital out but that is a maze of output types like spdif and electrical spdif and optical > and even a new sony output from the new SB Live! 5.1 card > Sign me "Confused in Ohio" > You've got a ground loop between the stereo and PC. Go down to your local car stereo outlet or other consumer electronic place and buy yourself a stereo isolation transformer. You'll usually find them with the auto-stereo stuff. Costs between 10 and 20 bucks. Plug it in between the two systems. From mkropp@cathouse.mv.com Sat, 4 Nov 2000 08:54:45 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 08:54:45 -0500 From: Mike Kropp mkropp@cathouse.mv.com Subject: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls (was re: VNC, DCOM) Pretty much so but it's slooooow (but it is free...). I gave up on it. > -----Original Message----- > From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On > Behalf Of Simon Mason > Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 8:17 AM > To: 'Keith'; slinkelist@nirvis.com > Subject: RE: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls (was re: VNC, DCOM) > > > Does VNC do essentially the same thing as pcAnywhere? > > -----Original Message----- > From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On > Behalf Of Keith > Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 10:53 AM > To: slinkelist@nirvis.com > Subject: RE: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls (was re: VNC, DCOM) > > > Hello - I too find VNC to be a better solution for Multi-room Control than > DCOM and Slinkesrv. > > The one thing I found I could do with VNC that I could not do > with DCOM and > Slinkesrv was to let multiple PC's have simultaneous control of CDJ. > > I have a PC in the kitchen, one in the family room and one in each bedroom > simultaneously connected via VNC to a PC dedicated to running CDJ and the > Slink-e. This allows everyone to see or make changes to what is playing > from any location in the house. > > I like being able to roam around the house, walk up to the nearest PC, > glance at the screen to see what is playing, tickle the keyboard to search > for a specific song and add it to the playlist. > > I can't think of a better solution than VNC if you want multi-room control > from PC control stations. Multi-room control from handheld > remotes or wall > mounted controls is a different story. But from PC's I can't think of a > better solution than VNC. > > Regards, > Keith Weldon > > -----Original Message----- > From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com > [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com] On > Behalf Of Igal, Saleh > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 11:22 AM > To: Michael Holopainen > Cc: Slinke-List > Subject: [slinkelist] VNC, DCOM (was re: Multi-room controls) > > >From what I understand of VNC, it works similar to pcAnywhere, remote > controlling the host computer. However, while my laptop has a 1024X768 > screen, my server has a 1600X1024 wide-screen display, so I'd > have to scroll > around or mess with window sizing. Also, my wife uses CDJ too -- if I was > on the server, and she was using the laptop to control CDJ, CDJ would show > up on the server's screen. > > As for some of the other issues, I run strictly NT and 2000, don't use the > mp3 features, and didn't really have to do much to mess with > library/covers > paths. > > I think almost all networked CDJ users would agree that DCOM was a poor > choice for the networking protocol - a native sockets or encapsulated HTTP > implementation would be cleaner, more stable, easier to configure, > WAN-friendly for streaming control, firewall-friendly for WAN access from > work... It would also make it almost trivial to control the Slink-e from > almost any OS or scripting language. However, in my situation, > the pain of > dealing with DCOM is worth the benefit. > > All that being said, I bought an old terminal server on Ebay for > about $50, > and will likely roll my own native socket connection over Telnet, putting > DCOM to rest. I plan to just use the terminal server's virtual redirector > software to direct COM7 and COM8 on the laptop to the Slink-e and > DXS ports > on the terminal server. Then, CDJ will think it has a direct > connection to > the Slink-e and DXS. I'll post my results to the list when I get > around to > messing with it. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Holopainen [mailto:michael@laserle.fi] > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 2:19 am > To: Igal, Saleh > Subject: Re: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls > > > Have you tried VNC ?? > > http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/download.html > > I for one find it MUCH better that DCOM : > > 1. no need for NT server, DCOMcnfg, no need to manually > 2. mp3 play on "server" = computer connected on slink > 3. no need to mess with library-covers-mp3_files paths > 4. I haven't crashed CDJ / VNC not even once in past 1-2 years > 5. You can do MUCH more than just CDJ with VNC > 6. Easy to set up > 7. Small prog > 8. You only need to install 1 CDJ (less updating, no version conflict) > 9. no need for slinkeserv > 10. Oh jeah, and the "small" detail that it's not MS product, so it > actually works > 11. You can even use CDJ from remote UNIX (Linux) machine > > -michael (A) > > "Igal, Saleh" wrote: > > > > I use a laptop with an 802.11 wireless connection; a server runs > slinkesrv. > > The server also has my MDB file, covers, and playlists. If I'm anywhere > > within earshot, I just grab the laptop to control CDJ. It > works great -- > I > > get full CDJ control from anywhere inside or outside the house. > > > > There are two annoyances that you will see in any CDJ/DCOM network > > configuration. First, CDJ updates reset the DCOM connection data, so I > have > > to run DCOMCNFG and reconfigure DCOM after every CDJ update. Second, if > CDJ > > crashes, I have to manually go and restart slinkesrv. > > > > The newer 11 Mbps wireless cards are fast enough that there's no > significant > > difference between having the MDB and covers on the server versus the > > laptop. If my wife's using the laptop, I just revert back to > running CDJ > on > > the server, since it has the MDB and covers. > > > > If you're planning to buy a new PC anyway, I'd strongly recommend > > considering spending a few hundred bucks more for a laptop and wireless > LAN. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On > > Behalf Of Ron Tugender > > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 10:08 am > > To: Slinke-List > > Subject: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls > > > > I've been using Slink-e/CDJ for a while now, but in a rather simple way. > > I've had in my office one PC running CDJ, natively controlling a pair of > > Sony changers in the living room, with a long Cat-5 run from > the PC to the > > Slink-e and a long speaker connection from the amplifier in the living > room > > to satellite speakers in the office. I did most of my listening in the > > office, so having the primary CDJ control there was convenient enough. > > > > I've now acquired a home theatre setup with gorgeous audio in the living > > room. I still intend to do a fair amount of listening in the > office, but > > now quite a bit more in the living room. I now want to control the Sony > > players through CDJ (or perhaps PartyGUI) in both the office and the > living > > room. > > > > I have a few thoughts on how I might do this, but before I bias the > feedback > > I'd rather first ask for suggestions from people who have already done > > something similar. To focus the suggestions, I'm prepared if > necessary to > > put another PC in the living room and LAN connection between the living > room > > and office. > > > > Ideas, anyone? > > > > Thanks, > > Ron > > > > ================================================ > > Ron Tugender > > 408-378-0777 > > ron@tugender.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist > > > > _______________________________________________ > > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist > > -- > --"Would you fly on airplane controlled by MS Windows ?"-- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > | Michael Holopainen | Valuraudantie 25 | Tel: +358-(0)9-35093825 | > | | 00700 Helsinki | Fax : +358-(0)9-35093850 | > | Laserle Oy | Finland | email: michael@laserle.fi| > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist > > > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist > > > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist > > From ricke@microsoft.com Sat, 4 Nov 2000 05:59:57 -0800 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 05:59:57 -0800 From: Rick Engle ricke@microsoft.com Subject: [slinkelist] hum solution... This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C04667.83C05650 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi Carl, I saw your message on the slink-e list. I had bad hum problems as well. I pipe all of my PC audio out to a Phast audio distribution system and stumbled across a great product called SteroLink, which does a direct digital to analog conversion and bypasses the sound card, it uses a USB sound driver. I can crank up the music or even tuen the volume completely down on my amp and here no hum at all. Its $199 but worth it. Check it out at http://www.stereo-link.com Rick ------_=_NextPart_001_01C04667.83C05650 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Carl, I saw your message on the slink-e list.  I had bad hum problems as = well.  I pipe all of my PC audio out = to a Phast audio distribution system and stumbled across a great product = called SteroLink, which does a direct digital to analog conversion and bypasses the sound = card, it uses a USB sound driver.   I can crank up the music or even tuen the volume completely down = on my amp and here no hum at all.  = Its $199 but worth it.

Check it out at http://www.stereo-link.com=

 

=

   = Rick

 

=

 

=
------_=_NextPart_001_01C04667.83C05650-- From simon@themasons.net Sat, 4 Nov 2000 10:07:20 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 10:07:20 -0500 From: Simon Mason simon@themasons.net Subject: [slinkelist] hum solution... This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C04647.0615FAE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Can you address it as a separate device in CDJ with the "Play MP3 through" option? -----Original Message----- From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On Behalf Of Rick Engle Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 9:00 AM To: cjrose@mediaone.net Cc: slinkelist@nirvis.com Subject: [slinkelist] hum solution... Hi Carl, I saw your message on the slink-e list. I had bad hum problems as well. I pipe all of my PC audio out to a Phast audio distribution system and stumbled across a great product called SteroLink, which does a direct digital to analog conversion and bypasses the sound card, it uses a USB sound driver. I can crank up the music or even tuen the volume completely down on my amp and here no hum at all. Its $199 but worth it. Check it out at http://www.stereo-link.com Rick ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C04647.0615FAE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Can=20 you address it as a separate device in CDJ with the "Play MP3 through"=20 option?
-----Original Message-----
From: = slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com=20 [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On Behalf Of Rick=20 Engle
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 9:00 = AM
To:=20 cjrose@mediaone.net
Cc: = slinkelist@nirvis.com
Subject:=20 [slinkelist] hum solution...

Hi=20 Carl, I saw your message on the slink-e list.  I had bad hum problems as = well.  I pipe all of my PC audio = out to a=20 Phast audio distribution system and stumbled across a great product = called=20 SteroLink, which does a direct digital to analog conversion and = bypasses the=20 sound card, it uses a USB sound driver.   I can crank up the = music or even=20 tuen the volume completely down on my amp and here no hum at all.  Its $199 but worth=20 it.

Check=20 it out at http://www.stereo-link.com<= /o:p>

 

  =20 Rick

 

 

<= /DIV>
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C04647.0615FAE0-- From simon@themasons.net Sat, 4 Nov 2000 10:11:52 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 10:11:52 -0500 From: Simon Mason simon@themasons.net Subject: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls (was re: VNC, DCOM) The most obvious client server approach would be a web based version. Run the slinkeserv on the web server, attach with any browser anywhere, and you have complete control of the cds and mp3s. All the audio output from the mp3s would be on the server, or wherever the slinkeserv is running. This would of course require a great deal of re-engineering for Colby, and probably some lost functionality as a CDJ web version would not be as clean as the application. -----Original Message----- From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On Behalf Of Mike Kropp Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 8:55 AM To: slinkelist@nirvis.com Subject: RE: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls (was re: VNC, DCOM) Pretty much so but it's slooooow (but it is free...). I gave up on it. > -----Original Message----- > From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On > Behalf Of Simon Mason > Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 8:17 AM > To: 'Keith'; slinkelist@nirvis.com > Subject: RE: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls (was re: VNC, DCOM) > > > Does VNC do essentially the same thing as pcAnywhere? > > -----Original Message----- > From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On > Behalf Of Keith > Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 10:53 AM > To: slinkelist@nirvis.com > Subject: RE: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls (was re: VNC, DCOM) > > > Hello - I too find VNC to be a better solution for Multi-room Control than > DCOM and Slinkesrv. > > The one thing I found I could do with VNC that I could not do > with DCOM and > Slinkesrv was to let multiple PC's have simultaneous control of CDJ. > > I have a PC in the kitchen, one in the family room and one in each bedroom > simultaneously connected via VNC to a PC dedicated to running CDJ and the > Slink-e. This allows everyone to see or make changes to what is playing > from any location in the house. > > I like being able to roam around the house, walk up to the nearest PC, > glance at the screen to see what is playing, tickle the keyboard to search > for a specific song and add it to the playlist. > > I can't think of a better solution than VNC if you want multi-room control > from PC control stations. Multi-room control from handheld > remotes or wall > mounted controls is a different story. But from PC's I can't think of a > better solution than VNC. > > Regards, > Keith Weldon > > -----Original Message----- > From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com > [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com] On > Behalf Of Igal, Saleh > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 11:22 AM > To: Michael Holopainen > Cc: Slinke-List > Subject: [slinkelist] VNC, DCOM (was re: Multi-room controls) > > >From what I understand of VNC, it works similar to pcAnywhere, remote > controlling the host computer. However, while my laptop has a 1024X768 > screen, my server has a 1600X1024 wide-screen display, so I'd > have to scroll > around or mess with window sizing. Also, my wife uses CDJ too -- if I was > on the server, and she was using the laptop to control CDJ, CDJ would show > up on the server's screen. > > As for some of the other issues, I run strictly NT and 2000, don't use the > mp3 features, and didn't really have to do much to mess with > library/covers > paths. > > I think almost all networked CDJ users would agree that DCOM was a poor > choice for the networking protocol - a native sockets or encapsulated HTTP > implementation would be cleaner, more stable, easier to configure, > WAN-friendly for streaming control, firewall-friendly for WAN access from > work... It would also make it almost trivial to control the Slink-e from > almost any OS or scripting language. However, in my situation, > the pain of > dealing with DCOM is worth the benefit. > > All that being said, I bought an old terminal server on Ebay for > about $50, > and will likely roll my own native socket connection over Telnet, putting > DCOM to rest. I plan to just use the terminal server's virtual redirector > software to direct COM7 and COM8 on the laptop to the Slink-e and > DXS ports > on the terminal server. Then, CDJ will think it has a direct > connection to > the Slink-e and DXS. I'll post my results to the list when I get > around to > messing with it. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Holopainen [mailto:michael@laserle.fi] > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 2:19 am > To: Igal, Saleh > Subject: Re: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls > > > Have you tried VNC ?? > > http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/download.html > > I for one find it MUCH better that DCOM : > > 1. no need for NT server, DCOMcnfg, no need to manually > 2. mp3 play on "server" = computer connected on slink > 3. no need to mess with library-covers-mp3_files paths > 4. I haven't crashed CDJ / VNC not even once in past 1-2 years > 5. You can do MUCH more than just CDJ with VNC > 6. Easy to set up > 7. Small prog > 8. You only need to install 1 CDJ (less updating, no version conflict) > 9. no need for slinkeserv > 10. Oh jeah, and the "small" detail that it's not MS product, so it > actually works > 11. You can even use CDJ from remote UNIX (Linux) machine > > -michael (A) > > "Igal, Saleh" wrote: > > > > I use a laptop with an 802.11 wireless connection; a server runs > slinkesrv. > > The server also has my MDB file, covers, and playlists. If I'm anywhere > > within earshot, I just grab the laptop to control CDJ. It > works great -- > I > > get full CDJ control from anywhere inside or outside the house. > > > > There are two annoyances that you will see in any CDJ/DCOM network > > configuration. First, CDJ updates reset the DCOM connection data, so I > have > > to run DCOMCNFG and reconfigure DCOM after every CDJ update. Second, if > CDJ > > crashes, I have to manually go and restart slinkesrv. > > > > The newer 11 Mbps wireless cards are fast enough that there's no > significant > > difference between having the MDB and covers on the server versus the > > laptop. If my wife's using the laptop, I just revert back to > running CDJ > on > > the server, since it has the MDB and covers. > > > > If you're planning to buy a new PC anyway, I'd strongly recommend > > considering spending a few hundred bucks more for a laptop and wireless > LAN. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On > > Behalf Of Ron Tugender > > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 10:08 am > > To: Slinke-List > > Subject: [slinkelist] Multi-room controls > > > > I've been using Slink-e/CDJ for a while now, but in a rather simple way. > > I've had in my office one PC running CDJ, natively controlling a pair of > > Sony changers in the living room, with a long Cat-5 run from > the PC to the > > Slink-e and a long speaker connection from the amplifier in the living > room > > to satellite speakers in the office. I did most of my listening in the > > office, so having the primary CDJ control there was convenient enough. > > > > I've now acquired a home theatre setup with gorgeous audio in the living > > room. I still intend to do a fair amount of listening in the > office, but > > now quite a bit more in the living room. I now want to control the Sony > > players through CDJ (or perhaps PartyGUI) in both the office and the > living > > room. > > > > I have a few thoughts on how I might do this, but before I bias the > feedback > > I'd rather first ask for suggestions from people who have already done > > something similar. To focus the suggestions, I'm prepared if > necessary to > > put another PC in the living room and LAN connection between the living > room > > and office. > > > > Ideas, anyone? > > > > Thanks, > > Ron > > > > ================================================ > > Ron Tugender > > 408-378-0777 > > ron@tugender.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist > > > > _______________________________________________ > > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist > > -- > --"Would you fly on airplane controlled by MS Windows ?"-- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > | Michael Holopainen | Valuraudantie 25 | Tel: +358-(0)9-35093825 | > | | 00700 Helsinki | Fax : +358-(0)9-35093850 | > | Laserle Oy | Finland | email: michael@laserle.fi| > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist > > > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist > > > > _______________________________________________ > slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com > http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist > > _______________________________________________ slinkelist maillist - slinkelist@nirvis.com http://www.nirvis.com/mailman/listinfo/slinkelist From shawn@sboyle.com Sat, 4 Nov 2000 11:42:13 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 11:42:13 -0500 From: Shawn Boyle shawn@sboyle.com Subject: [slinkelist] Two sound cards and hum This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C04654.46407340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Double check your settings in the Sounds applet [on the control panel]. The couple of problems that I had with setting up two sound cards were all related to Windows. I had only two sound cards installed but Windows gave me three choices when selecting my default card. One of them caused my whole system to choke and the other two were the actual sound cards. I'd check this setting and make sure that Windows hasn't grabbed your other sound card [for whatever reason] and made it the default. I also found that which PCI [I'm assuming these two cards are PCI] slot the cards were in made a difference. As a last resort you might want to try swapping the two cards around. Another solution for the ground loop problem that I've heard [from this list I think] is to connect the chassis of your computer to the chassis of your amp. I haven't tried this yet but I think someone else on this list has. It'd certainly be worth a try, and would be cheaper than buying an isolator from RS. Although if your computer is far from you amp it might not be worth it if you have to run another wire. -Shawn -----Original Message----- From: Carl J. Rose [mailto:cjrose@mediaone.net] Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 12:40 AM To: Shawn Boyle Cc: slinkeList@nirvis.com; John W. Schaaf Subject: Re: [slinkelist] Two sound cards and hum I tried the two sound card thing with a SB AWE 64 as default and a D-man card with RCA in and out to play mp3 with cdj. Well, It worked right the first after install. However, after that the default card took over and played everything, including mp3 with cdj! The settings in cdj still showed the auxilliary card in control, but the proof is in the pudding. Any thoughts about this? Also, I have a terrible problem with hum when I put my audio out from my sound card intomy Denon receiver for playback. I have moved the unit and even tried a Pioneer receiver and even changed sound cards and still no help. You Slinker's out all talk about your mp3/cd playback mixes,! Are you putting up with a pretty noticeable hum or have you got some magic bullet? I have even tried digital out but that is a maze of output types like spdif and electrical spdif and optical and even a new sony output from the new SB Live! 5.1 card Sign me "Confused in Ohio" Thanks, Carl ----- Original Message ----- From: Shawn Boyle To: slinkeList@nirvis.com Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 1:13 PM Subject: RE: [slinkelist] Two sound cards I use two SB PCI cards. They have two slightly different model numbers but from what I can tell are exactly the same. The setup was much easier than expected. My HA server runs Win2K Pro, and already had one SB working. I just added the second card, Windows found it, and everything pretty much worked. I was ready for some major problems, but I didn't run into any. You set one of the cards as the default sound device. Windows will use this card for all of the system sounds and most other programs will use this card for their sounds. But if you have a program that supports using a different sound card, like CDJ [thanks again Colby], then you can choose which sound card that program uses. If you're writing your own program there's a document on Microsoft's site that explains how to choose different sound cards using VB. I haven't really looked at it but on first glance it seemed pretty straight forward. On my HA server I have all of the system sounds go to a small set of desktop speakers, CDJ sends MP3 output to the other card which is connected to my amp. -Shawn -----Original Message----- From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On Behalf Of Carl J. Rose Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 11:01 PM To: slinkeList@nirvis.com Subject: [slinkelist] Two sound cards There has been some talk about using two sound cards on this list. Many questions come to mind. Do the choices of cards matter? What settings are needed? Can you direct different sounds to different cards? Thanks for your help, carl ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C04654.46407340 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Double = check your=20 settings in the Sounds applet [on the control panel]. The couple of = problems=20 that I had with setting up two sound cards were all related to Windows. = I had=20 only two sound cards installed but Windows gave me three choices when = selecting=20 my default card. One of them caused my whole system to choke and the = other two=20 were the actual sound cards. I'd check this setting and make sure that = Windows=20 hasn't grabbed your other sound card [for whatever reason] and made it = the=20 default. I also found that which PCI [I'm assuming these two cards are = PCI] slot=20 the cards were in made a difference. As a last resort you might want to = try=20 swapping the two cards around.
 
Another solution for=20 the ground loop problem that I've heard [from this list I think] is to = connect=20 the chassis of your computer to the chassis of your amp. I haven't tried = this=20 yet but I think someone else on this list has. It'd certainly be worth a = try,=20 and would be cheaper than buying an isolator from RS. Although if your = computer=20 is far from you amp it might not be worth it if you have to run another=20 wire.
 
-Shawn
-----Original Message-----
From: Carl J. Rose=20 [mailto:cjrose@mediaone.net]
Sent: Saturday, November 04, = 2000 12:40=20 AM
To: Shawn Boyle
Cc: slinkeList@nirvis.com; John = W.=20 Schaaf
Subject: Re: [slinkelist] Two sound cards and=20 hum

I tried the two sound card thing with = a SB AWE 64=20 as default and a D-man card with RCA in and out to play mp3 with = cdj. =20 Well, It worked right the first after install.  However, after = that the=20 default card took over and played everything, including mp3 with = cdj! =20 The settings in cdj still showed  the auxilliary card in control, = but the=20 proof is in the pudding.  Any thoughts about this?
 
Also, I have a terrible problem with = hum when I=20 put my audio out from my sound card intomy Denon receiver for = playback. =20 I have moved the unit and even tried a Pioneer receiver and even = changed sound=20 cards and still no help.  You Slinker's out all talk about your = mp3/cd=20 playback mixes,!  Are you putting up with a pretty noticeable hum = or have=20 you got some magic bullet?
 
I have even tried digital out but = that is a maze=20 of output types like spdif and electrical spdif and optical and even a = new=20 sony output from the new SB Live! 5.1 card
Sign me "Confused in = Ohio"
 
Thanks,
Carl
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Shawn = Boyle=20
Sent: Friday, October 27, = 2000 1:13=20 PM
Subject: RE: [slinkelist] Two = sound=20 cards

I = use two SB PCI=20 cards. They have two slightly different model numbers but from what = I can=20 tell are exactly the same. The setup was much easier than expected. = My HA=20 server runs Win2K Pro, and already had one SB working. I just added = the=20 second card, Windows found it, and everything pretty much worked. I = was=20 ready for some major problems, but I didn't run into=20 any.
 
You set one of=20 the cards as the default sound device. Windows will use this card = for all of=20 the system sounds and most other programs will use this card for = their=20 sounds. But if you have a program that supports using a = different sound=20 card, like CDJ [thanks again Colby], then you can choose which sound = card=20 that program uses. If you're writing your own program there's a = document on=20 Microsoft's site that explains how to choose different sound cards = using VB.=20 I haven't really looked at it but on first glance it seemed pretty = straight=20 forward.
 
On = my HA server=20 I have all of the system sounds go to a small set of desktop = speakers, CDJ=20 sends MP3 output to the other card which is connected to my=20 amp.
 
-Shawn
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com = [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On=20 Behalf Of Carl J. Rose
Sent: Thursday, October 26, = 2000=20 11:01 PM
To: slinkeList@nirvis.com
Subject:=20 [slinkelist] Two sound cards

There has been some talk about = using two=20 sound cards on this list.  Many questions come to = mind.
Do the choices of cards = matter?
What settings are = needed?
Can you direct different sounds = to different=20 cards?
Thanks for your help, =20 = carl
------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C04654.46407340-- From cboles@socrates.Berkeley.EDU Sat, 4 Nov 2000 09:23:51 -0800 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 09:23:51 -0800 From: Colby Boles cboles@socrates.Berkeley.EDU Subject: [slinkelist] Calculating the CRCC for the Q-Subcode on SPDIF My turn to ask a question :) I'm writing a program to record digital audio to disk using a RME Digi96 sound card. I'm using the Q-Subcode information on the SPDIF signal to divide the tracks as exactly as I can. I've noticed that the Q-Subcode has errors in it occasionally and I would like to be able to identify and ignore these Q-Subcode frames by checking them against their included CRCC, but I'm running into a couple of problems: 1) I don't know what method is being used to calculate the CRCC. I've tried all 16-bit polynomials, but haven't found a consistent match. Maybe I'm running the block through the shift registers in the wrong byte/bit order? 2) The Q-Subcode frame is 98 bits long on the CD, but only 96 bits in size on the SPDIF signal (missing the S0 and S1 bits), so hopefully the CRCC doesn't use S0 and S1 right? I guess I could do a CRCC against all 4 possible S bit combinations... Thanks, Colby From ricke@microsoft.com Sat, 4 Nov 2000 10:08:17 -0800 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 10:08:17 -0800 From: Rick Engle ricke@microsoft.com Subject: [slinkelist] hum solution... This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0468A.34DCA340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I'm not sure, I see the dev/wave and dev/dsound options under the dropdown in CDJ/options but I'm not sure what audio device they correspond to. I have my USB audio out set as the default from within the Win 2000 control panel. Rick -----Original Message----- From: Simon Mason [mailto:simon@themasons.net] Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 10:07 AM To: Rick Engle; cjrose@mediaone.net Cc: slinkelist@nirvis.com Subject: RE: [slinkelist] hum solution... Can you address it as a separate device in CDJ with the "Play MP3 through" option? -----Original Message----- From: slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On Behalf Of Rick Engle Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 9:00 AM To: cjrose@mediaone.net Cc: slinkelist@nirvis.com Subject: [slinkelist] hum solution... Hi Carl, I saw your message on the slink-e list. I had bad hum problems as well. I pipe all of my PC audio out to a Phast audio distribution system and stumbled across a great product called SteroLink, which does a direct digital to analog conversion and bypasses the sound card, it uses a USB sound driver. I can crank up the music or even tuen the volume completely down on my amp and here no hum at all. Its $199 but worth it. Check it out at http://www.stereo-link.com Rick ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0468A.34DCA340 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I= ’m not sure, I see the dev/wave and dev/dsound options under the dropdown in CDJ/options but I’m not sure what audio device they correspond = to.   I have my USB audio out = set as the default from within the Win 2000 control = panel.

<= span style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">    = Rick

<= ![if = !supportEmptyParas]> 

=

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Mason [mailto:simon@themasons.net]
Sent: Saturday, November = 04, 2000 10:07 AM
To: Rick Engle; cjrose@mediaone.net
Cc: = slinkelist@nirvis.com
Subject: RE: = [slinkelist] hum solution...

 

Can you address = it as a separate device in CDJ with the "Play MP3 through" = option?=

-----Original Message-----
From: = slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com [mailto:slinkelist-admin@nirvis.com]On Behalf Of Rick Engle
Sent: Saturday, November = 04, 2000 9:00 AM
To: = cjrose@mediaone.net
Cc: = slinkelist@nirvis.com
Subject: [slinkelist] = hum solution...

Hi Carl, I saw your message on the slink-e = list.  I had bad hum problems as = well.  I pipe all of my PC audio out = to a Phast audio distribution system and stumbled across a great product called = SteroLink, which does a direct digital to analog conversion and bypasses the sound = card, it uses a USB sound driver.   I can crank up the music or even tuen the volume completely down = on my amp and here no hum at all.  = Its $199 but worth it.

Check it out at http://www.stereo-link.com=

 

=

   Rick

 

=

 

=
------_=_NextPart_001_01C0468A.34DCA340-- From mhansen@alarmlink.com Sat, 4 Nov 2000 10:23:23 -0800 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 10:23:23 -0800 From: Michael E. Hansen mhansen@alarmlink.com Subject: [slinkelist] Client/Server This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C04649.43123EC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For Those of you who may be looking for a client/server application here = is an application that needs to be tested. There is not much in the way = of documentation or help yet. The server runs on a machine with = SlinkeServe. The program also does X10, Lightolier Multiset and = Brilliance, Statnet and RCS thermostats, Xantech ZPR68, etc. It is = licensed by the module and each module will be $99. It can be run in = demo mode for short periods. This is a VB6 app and I am considering = making the source for the client available. I would appreciate any feedback if you would like to try it out. http://www.homelinkautomation.com/Download/HLServerSetup.EXE http://www.homelinkautomation.com/Download/HLClientSetup.EXE =20 Thanks, Mike Hansen ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C04649.43123EC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
For Those of you who may be looking for